Autor:
Dr.
Michaell Parra
E-mail:
michaelwparra@yahoo.com
Delray Beach, USA |
|
THE ROLE OF PROPHYLACTIC RETRIEVABLE
INFERIOR VENA CAVA FILTERS IN TRAUMA
PATIENTS |
Objective
Patients with multiple trauma often have
injuries that preclude the use of
anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE)
prophylaxis. Temporary inferior vena cava (IVC)
filters offer protection against pulmonary
embolism (PE) during the early immediate
injury and perioperative period, when risk
is highest, while averting potential long
term sequelae of permanent IVC filters. The
purpose of this study was to document the
initial experience, indications, clinical
success, and complications with a specific
prophylactic retrievable IVC filter at a
level II trauma center.
Hypothesis
Prophylactic retrievable IVC filters are
safe and effective in trauma patients who
are at high risk for VTE and have a
provisional contraindication(s) to
anticoagulant therapy and/or barriers to
placement of sequential compression devices
(SCD’s).
Design
Retrospective Review
Setting
Urban level II trauma center.
Subjects
Multiple trauma patients undergoing VTE
prophylaxis. All patients were at high risk
for VTE but had provisional
contraindication(s) to prophylactic
anticoagulation therapy with low molecular
weight heparin (LMWH) and /or barriers to
placement of SCD’s.
Interventions
The interventional
radiologist placed the Recovery Filter (RF)
in all selected patients. The filter was
removed when the patient could safely be
prophylaxed with LMWH and/or the risk of VTE
had diminished due to resumption of full
physical activity.
Main Outcome Measures
Complications of filter
insertion and removal, venous thrombosis,
pulmonary embolism, and length of stay of
the filter.
Results
From July 1, 2004 to February
1, 2005, nine (n=9) patients underwent
placement of RF temporary IVC filters. Male
to female ratio was 8:1. Ages ranged from
(18-50) with a mean of (31). Indications for
placement were recent pulmonary embolism
(n=1), and thromboembolism prophylaxis
(n=8). All nine patients had a provisional
contraindication(s) to prophylactic and/or
therapeutic anticoagulation therapy with
LMWH, and /or barriers to placement of
SCD’S. The mean Injury Severity Score was
(24). Mechanism of injury in all cases was
blunt. There were no complications
associated with filter insertion or removal.
There were no documented instances of VTE
following IVC filter placement and removal.
The contraindication(s) for anticoagulant
therapy with LMWH were the following:
traumatic brain injury, non-operative solid
organ injury, pelvic fractures and spinal
fractures with associated neurologic
deficits. The contraindications for SCD’s
were usually long bone fractures that
required immobilization with traction or
ex-fitter devices. The mean duration between
placement and removal was (33) days (range
10 - 69 days). Four filters were left in as
permanent filters due to the ongoing risk of
DVT/PE. In all cases, no trapped thrombus
was seen within the filter upon removal.
Conclusions
Although this experience is
small, retrospective, and deficient in
long-term follow up, prophylactic
retrievable IVC filters are safe and
effective in trauma patients who are at high
risk for venous thromboembolism and have a
provisional contraindication(s) to
anticoagulant therapy. Prophylactic
retrievable IVC filters are particularly
beneficial in younger trauma patients who
are more likely to experience possible
long-term complications from permanent IVC
filters. We have also demonstrated the
feasibility and safety of retrieval of up to
(69) days after implantation of the new
Recovery Filter. The RF does not require of
any intervening repositioning procedure as
compared to other temporary IVC filters. The
RF can also be left in place as a permanent
filter if needed. In patients with multiple
trauma, prophylactic retrievable IVC filters
serve as an effective “bridge” to
anticoagulation therapy for venous
thromboembolism prophylaxis.
|